Get An Introduction to Abstract Algebra PDF


Show description

Read or Download An Introduction to Abstract Algebra PDF

Similar abstract books

Download PDF by Keith Kendig: A Guide to Plane Algebraic Curves

This advisor is a pleasant creation to aircraft algebraic curves. It emphasizes geometry and instinct, and the presentation is stored concrete. you will discover an abundance of images and examples to assist enhance your instinct concerning the topic, that is so simple to figuring out and asking fruitful questions.

New PDF release: Combinatorial Group Theory

The AMS precise consultation on Combinatorial staff Theory---Infinite teams, held on the college of Maryland in April 1988, used to be designed to attract jointly researchers in numerous components of endless team conception, specifically combinatorial staff conception, to percentage equipment and effects. The consultation mirrored the energy and pursuits in endless staff thought, with eighteen audio system featuring lectures overlaying a variety of group-theoretic themes, from only logical inquiries to geometric equipment.

New PDF release: Non-archimedean analysis : a systematic approach to rigid

: So eine Illrbeit witb eigentIid) nie rertig, guy muli iie fur fertig erfHiren, wenn guy nad) 8eit nnb Umftiinben bas moglid)fte get an qat. (@oetqe

Additional resources for An Introduction to Abstract Algebra

Example text

Definition: For integers x,y,n, we say x is equivalent to y modulo n if there exists an integer k such that x = y + nk. We denote this equivalence relation x ▷ y by x = y mod n. ☐ Equivalence relations are defined on a particular set and partition this set into several subsets. These subsets are mutually disjoint. If we examine one of these subsets, every element contained therein is equivalent to every other element in the subset. This is the idea of an equivalence class. Definition: Given a set S and element x ∈ S with equivalence relation ▷, the equivalence class of x is the subset of S that contains all elements of S that are equivalent to x.

We consider (x · y)2 = (x · y) · (x · y) = x · (y · x) · y = x · (x · y) · y = (x · x) · (y · y) = x2 · y 2 We are justified in making the statement x · y = y · x due to the hypothesis that G is abelian. ” It remains to show the other half of the statement. Now suppose that for all x, y ∈ G we have (xy)2 = x2 y 2 . Expanding this expression we see x · y · x · y = x · x · y · y . If we multiply on the left by x−1 and on the right by y −1 we have: x−1 · x · y · x · y · y −1 = x−1 · x · x · y · y · y −1 which simplifies to y · x = x · y .

Suppose by way of contradiction that g = g are both inverses of g . g = e · g = (g · g) · g = g · (g · g ) = g · e = g This shows that g = g , therefore inverses are unique. ☐ The previous theorem shows that for a group G and a, b, x ∈ G , the equation ax = b has a unique solution for x . Since a has a unique inverse, a−1 we may write x = a−1 ax = a−1 b . Theorem 6. If a, b are elements of a group G then (a · b)−1 = b−1 · a−1 . Proof. We prove this by using the definition of inverse. For a group G and a, b ∈ G , we consider (a · b) · (b−1 a−1 ) = a · ((b · b−1 ) · a−1 ) = a · (e · a−1 ) = a · a−1 = e A similar series of steps shows that (b−1 · a−1 ) · (a · b) = e .

Download PDF sample

An Introduction to Abstract Algebra by

by Mark

Rated 4.58 of 5 – based on 17 votes